Meyler warns teammates over Arsenal backlash

first_imgKick off is at 7. The winner will host Watford next Sunday in the quarter final.The visitors are without the suspended Francis Coquelin and the injured Petr Cech and Laurent Koscielny.Meyler has warned his teammates that despite their recent defeats to Manchester United and Swansea, Arsenal are still strong.last_img

Read more

UCL: Liverpool beat RB Salzburg 2-0 to make Round of 16

first_imgDefending champions Liverpool reached the Champions League last 16 as Group E winners thanks to two second-half goals against Red Bull Salzburg.The Reds, who needed at least a point to progress, were on the ropes at times against attacking opposition.But from the moment Naby Keita headed in Sadio Mane’s cross, there was only going to be one winner.Mohamed Salah clinched victory 100 seconds later with an excellent finish from a tight angle.Jurgen Klopp’s side needed the three points to top the group after Napoli beat Genk 4-0.The Reds will discover their Champions League last-16 opponents in Monday’s draw in Nyon, Switzerland (11:00 GMT). Real and Atletico Madrid are both possible opponents.Salzburg, who had scored 87 goals in 24 games before this, drop into the Europa League last 32. Their 19-year-old striker Erling Braut Haaland had chances to score but failed to become the first player to ever score in his first six Champions League appearances. Source: BBClast_img read more

Read more

Techiman City review application dismissed

first_imgTechiman City Football Club’s review application against the GFA Appeals Committee ruling delivered on Friday 27th November, 2015 has been dismissed.Below is the full ruling on the review application by Techiman City Football Club:PANELISTS1.    EMMANUEL ANNAN – CHAIRMAN 2.    ALHAJI FAROUCK SEIDU – VICE CHAIRMAN 3.    OWUSU ANSAH AWERE – MEMBER 4.    CLAUDE OPPON – MEMBER5.    DIVINE SUNU – MEMBER6.    KWAME TAKYI – MEMBER7.    BAFFOUR AKOTO – MEMBER8.    DANIEL ODURO – SECRETARYThis is an application by Techiman City Football Club invoking the review jurisdiction of the Appeals Committee of the GFA to review its decision dated 27/11/15.The grounds for the review were stated as follows:•    Errors of law and lack of jurisdiction•    Failure to refer to and apply GFA Regulations and Statutes;•    Procedural flaws and abuse of GFA Regulations and Statutes; and •    Bad precedenceOf all the grounds, the one that affects the panel of the Committee and its lack of jurisdiction shall be addressed first because if indeed the panel was improperly constituted then a fortiori it would not have the required jurisdiction to make the decision complained of and in that case there will be no need to go into the other grounds of the review. According to the applicant, the matter referred to the Committee by the Ethics Committee was in a form of a review application and therefore the review panel of seven (7) members rather than the appeal panel of five (5) members should have sat on the matter. It is the applicant’s case that the said appeal panel made up of 5 members including the Chairman or Vice-Chairman lacked the requisite jurisdiction and therefore its decision must be quashed by this committee.Article 42.1 of the GFA Statutes states “The Appeals Committee shall be constituted by ten (10) members, five (5) of whom shall be empanelled to hear a given case. Seven (7) members shall be empanelled from the ten (10) to hear all applications for review.”The article is self-explanatory to the effect that 5 members form a quorum to hear any given case whilst 7 members are empanelled to hear applications for review. How then can applicant invoke the review jurisdiction of the Appeals Committee?Article 42.7 of the GFA Statutes is the answer. It says “The decision of the Appeals Committee in any matter shall be final provided that the Appeals Committee shall have power to review its own decision either suo motu or on an application by an aggrieved party”. It is therefore only under these two circumstances that the review jurisdiction of the Appeals Committee can be properly invoked (1) by an aggrieved applicant and (2) by the committee itself suo motu.In the instant case the matter was referred to the Appeals Committee by the Ethics Committee to have a second look at it. In our view, that referral (rightly or wrongly)did not invoke the review jurisdiction of the Appeals Committee as envisaged by article 42.7 of the GFA Statutes. The ordinary panel of 5 members that heard the matter was right and the said panel could not be said to lack the requsite jurisdiction. We have looked at the other grounds of the application for review and there is no exceptional circumstance why the said decision of the Appeals Committee dates 27/11/15 should be reviewed. The application is therefore dismissed.DATED IN ACCRA THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015last_img read more

Read more